Skip to content
H₂

Automatic vehicle detection & fueling authorization

Technology comparison & system design for a hydrogen refueling operator.

RESULT

ANPR with a smart recognition model proved the most accurate path; it needs a clear field of view and a mount that covers both small cars and large trucks.

Infographic of the optical identification path: ANPR camera with IR reads the plate, OCR result is checked against the fleet whitelist and fueling is released
FIG. 01 — SELECTED: ANPR + IR → OCR → WHITELIST → RELEASE

Fleet drivers lose time on authorization at the dispenser: cards fail, apps need accounts. The operator wanted fueling to start the moment a known vehicle arrives; the open question was which identification technology does that most reliably.

Beyond reading a plate or a tag, every candidate had to authenticate against the whitelist on the authentication server and survive the edge cases: two vehicles arriving at once, vehicles on both sides of the dispenser fueling at different pressure levels, and re-authentication when an aborted fueling restarts.

I tested and compared three identification paths against the same authentication server: an ANPR camera with IR illumination, active BLE tags, including a variant with an activation button, and HF RFID.

Locating the vehicle mattered as much as detecting it: multiple antennas pointing in different directions tell left from right for BLE and RFID; BLE channel sounding estimates distance, but only holds up with an unobstructed view.

BLE works but loses reliability with metal between tag and antenna; HF RFID read dependably but was too costly per vehicle.

The comparison closed with a clear technology recommendation and tested handling for simultaneous arrivals, two-sided dispensers and re-authentication.

05

A data or systems problem in hydrogen or e-mobility?

Let's discuss it in a free 30-minute call, no obligation. In English, German or Dutch.